Is there an “evolutionary species similarity calculator”?

Is there an “evolutionary species similarity calculator”?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Is there a website where I can input pairs of species and get an "evolutionary similarity score"?

E.g. (numbers are completely made up)

  • Input: Chimp and Human, Output: 97%
  • Input: Cat and Human, Output: 85%
  • Input: Is Cat closer to Human or Chimp, or Snake, Output: Cat is closer to Chimp (87%), second is Human (85%) and Snake is last with 50%.

I have no idea what the actual scale should be, but I imagine there is at least one interesting scale, perhaps several.

Cross posted to Quora

Since the simple value of percentage of nucleic acid identity over whole genomes isn't very useful in taxonomy, you won't find these values published in a database, even if they were computed by someone in the process of other work.

One project that provides ready-for-consumption phylogenetic trees based on similarity metrics, by using orthologous genes between species, is OMA. They compute all orthologous genes between two species, and they are now at 1,235 species:

You could then read off the "distance" between cat and mouse from the eukaryotes tree. This value would then be more meaningful than the nucleic acid identity percentage.

Apart from the trees, using their OMAbrowser you can get for any species pair the number of common orthology groups, i.e., the number of common genes between those two species.

TimeTree gives you an estimate for time of divergence, which is also nice to know. But of course different species have different rates of evolution.


  1. Micheal

    Respect to the author for the topic. Kept it on my computer, it expresses itself very well

  2. Hugo

    I think you are not right. I offer to discuss it. Write to me in PM.

  3. Subhi

    At me a similar situation. I invite to discussion.

  4. Lippo

    Sorry for interfering, I would like to suggest another solution

  5. Shemus

    I like this idea, I completely agree with you.

  6. Ohcumgache

    wonderfully, the useful piece

Write a message